23/66
Home / Albums / ADA 1990 /

ADAPT (558)

ADAPT (558).JPG ADAPT (560)ThumbnailsADAPT (557)ADAPT (560)ThumbnailsADAPT (557)ADAPT (560)ThumbnailsADAPT (557)ADAPT (560)ThumbnailsADAPT (557)ADAPT (560)ThumbnailsADAPT (557)ADAPT (560)ThumbnailsADAPT (557)ADAPT (560)ThumbnailsADAPT (557)

Grapevine (the title is surrounded by grape leaves and clusters of grapes) Weekly

Happy birthday, TJ, see Editorial, p. 2.
New Thomas Pynchon novel reviewed, see p. 5.


FREE!
In This Issue:
Editorial . . . . ............ . . . 2
Letters to the Editor ..... 2
City Board Agenda.........2
Lithuanian Story to Tell..3
Grapevine Digest............3
Sheffield Nelson's Vi......4
The Way Were.................5
Grapevine Comics...........6
KUAF Radio Guide.........6
Classifieds.........................7
Community Sportsline.....7
Dictionary of Democracy..7
Watching the Environment 8
The Movies . . . . . . ..............8
Local Live Music . . . ..........8



Volume XXI, Number 32 A Free Weekly Newspaper Fayetteville, Arkansas Friday, April 13, 1990

PHOTO (by Tom Olin): The front line of a big march, headed by an African American man (George Roberts) in a motorized wheelchair with dark glasses and a sign reading "We Shall Overcome", a woman (Stephanie Thomas) with frizzy hair and mirror sunglasses in a manual wheelchair, a sign across her legs reads "Access is A Civil Right", a Latino blind man (Frank Lozano) standing tall with his back back, bandanna-headband, and dog-guide Frazier on his left all with stern expressions on their faces. To Frank's left a young girl (Jennifer Keelan) almost stands in her wheelchair yelling a chant as her grandmother and sister Kailee push her along. Behind them a man in a white button down shirt (Evan Kemp) smiles, Justin Dart's hat is visible over Stephanie's hair and he is being pushed by a tall man (Jay Rochlin) in a suit with a button on his lapel. Between Frank and Jennifer, a short man (Michael Winter) in a wheelchair is visible. Behind them, row upon row of marchers heads, several with mouths open chanting.

Breaking Down the Barriers
Civil Rights for People with Disabilities

by Yaél Hana Bethiem
In 1983 I considered killing myself. l considered this out of a deep despair, an agony over my life. In 1983 I had been diagnosed with a progressive disease. I could no longer work, could no longer sit in chairs and could stand for shorter and shorter periods of time. In other
words, I was becoming disabled. I was panicked. How could I live without my physical life, my strength, my independence?

What I didn't see at the time was that I was buying into our culture's attitudes about disability. I could not value myself or value my life because the system I had to fight to get my basic needs met, did not value me; l live in a culture that believes that "out of sight, out of mind" is acceptable policy for dealing with people with disabilities.

In a culture that values productivity above all else, those who cannot produce, or who need assistance to be able to produce, are considered a burden.

Our culture also has a myth called the “American way," which says that if anyone "tries hard enough" he or she can “make it." When
applied to people with disabilities this means that if only we “try harder" we can "overcome." We can rise above the barriers, showing
superhuman strength, and then we will be more acceptable. This attitude makes people believe the barriers do not need tn be removed.
Instead, they think we, the disabled, need to overcome them. In other words, the closer we cart be to “normal," the more we are accepted. Those who cannot become more normal are locked away, out of sight, out of mind. Those of us living within this oppression, for it is oppression, often internalize the culture's attitudes. We believe there is something wrong with us.

Millions of people share this fate with me; we are locked away by a society that would prefer to pretend we do not exist. We are imprisoned by attitudes that do not see people with disabilities as fully human; attitudes that expect us to "overcome" (or heal ourselves); attitudes that create barriers, or do not see the barriers that do exist. There are 43 million people with disabilities in the United States. We are one of the most repressed minorities in this country. We are denied access to basic rights, transportation, jobs, and respect.

For people with disabilities there are thousands of ways the oppression affects us, thousands of forms of prejudice and visible and
invisible barriers. An example of the effects of this oppression is the story of David Rivlin. David was a quadriplegic who, last summer,
chose to have his respirator turned off. He went to court to ask for the right to die. His story was aired on TV. I heard people around me say, “l would do that too. I wouldn't want to live like that."

David lived in a nursing home. He lay in bed twenty-four hours a day tied to a stable respirator. David didn't have to live this way. He could have had a portable respirator and thus been able to use a wheelchair. He didn't know about a portable respirator and no one ever told him. The government was paying $2300 day to keep David in a nursing home, but would pay only $207 a month for an attendant so David could live independently.

The day before David died, a reporter covering David's story discovered that money could have been gotten for David to live independently if someone had known how lo “work the system."

David's struggle reflects the struggle of people with disabilities in this country. If David, and other people with disabilities were given their right to make choices in their lives all along, there would be no necessity of fighting for the right to die.

The Americans With Disabilities Act

There is a growing awareness of the need for change in policy and attitude toward people with disabilities. Last year a bill was introduced in Congress called the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA would begin to guarantee civil rights for people with disabilities.

Although it has already been modified since its inception, the ADA, as it now stands, would be a beginning to removing barriers that prevent people with disabilities from participating in society. Unfortunately, the ADA is facing serious compromise due to powerful lobbies against it. It is also facing changes that would remove its power as a civil rights act.

Last summer, the ADA was passed almost unanimously by the Senate. It was endorsed by President Bush. It then moved into the House of Representatives, where it is now stalled. The most powerful lobbies against the bill are Greyhound and the National Federation of
Independent Businesses along with the Chambers of Commerce.

Greyhound is against the ADA because they will have to equip new buses with wheelchair lifts. They claim it will cost them millions of dollars, yet they are adding in costs that have nothing to do with the Americans With Disabilities Act. While using erroneous concepts for the cost figures, Greyhound is pouring money into Washington to fight the bill.

The National Federation of Independent Businesses also base their antagonism to the ADA on erroneous concepts. The NFIB is
saying the ADA will cause hardship for businesses. The ADA requires that public facilities constructed after the ADA becomes law
be accessible. Existing facilities have to be accessible within two years of enactment if the access is "readily achievable without much
difficulty or expense." In other words. businesses can decide for themselves whether they can afford to provide access.

On March 10, American Disabled for Accessible Public Transportation (ADAPT) held a march on Washington to promote awareness of the Americans With Disabilities Act. Over 1,000 people with disabilities came from all over the country. They marched from the White House to the steps of the Capitol. The rest of the week was filled with talks with key figures and demonstrations. Many people participated in planned civil disobedience aimed at calling attention to the current injustice.

Because the ADA is civil rights legislation, it ties in with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. New legislation has just been introduced that would create real remedies for violations of the Civil Rights Act. Because the ADA is tied to the Civil Rights Act these remedies would also apply to violations of the ADA. Opponents of ADA want to separate the ADA from the Civil Rights Act. For people with disabilities this would be a compromise that essentially negates the purpose of the ADA.

People with disabilities deserve to be treated fairly and humanely, which at this point we are not. It is time to remove the barriers, especially the barriers of mind. It is time to break down the walls that have kept people with disabilities imprisoned. The Americans With
Disabilities Act is a very important step. Please write to Hon. John Paul Hammerschmidt at U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. 20515 or 35 E. Mountain, Fayetteville, AR 72701 . Let him know you are aware of the ADA. Ask him to support it as it now stands.

Only unity can save our threatened planet.On every level we have to move out of the mindset of differences and into the awareness of
our shared humaneness. Now it is time also to move out of separation based on physical ability. Only then can we really share our resources. Only awareness of barriers can bring the possibility of their removal.

Yael Hana Bethiemn is a free lance writer from Eureka Springs.



0 comments