3/7
Home / Albums / Tag Access /

ADAPT (135)

ADAPT (135).JPG ADAPT (287)ThumbnailsADAPT (83)ADAPT (287)ThumbnailsADAPT (83)ADAPT (287)ThumbnailsADAPT (83)ADAPT (287)ThumbnailsADAPT (83)ADAPT (287)ThumbnailsADAPT (83)ADAPT (287)ThumbnailsADAPT (83)ADAPT (287)ThumbnailsADAPT (83)

The Denver Post 7/8/90
[This article continues in ADAPT 138, but the entire story has been included here for easier reading]

Perspective
Access for the disabled: Cost vs. benefit

Photo by RTD staff: A smiling African American man in a manual wheelchair, wearing a beret and with a sports coat over his lap is being helped to board a city bus by the driver, who is behind him. In front of the lift a woman stands waiting to board.
Caption reads: A LIFT: The President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities was given a demonstration of an RTD lift during its 1987 convention which was held in Denver.


By Al Knight
Denver Post Perspective Editor

Now, while the Americans with Disabilities Act is awaiting President Bush’s signature, would be a good time to reflect on what has been learned by this city's experience in attempting to provide full wheelchair access to public transportation.

Assuming the president signs the bill as he says he will, public transit systems all over America will have to begin purchasing new buses equipped with wheelchair lifts, as well instituting a variety of other steps designed to enlarge employment opportunities for the disabled, improve services in state and local government, enlarge public accommodations, and create a national telecommunication relay service to aid the blind and deaf.

Critics of the bill have argued that the nation is embarking upon a program without the vaguest clue of what its ultimate cost will be.

In many ways, the dispute is a duplication of what took place in Denver in the early 1980s as the Regional Transportation District developed its policy on how rapidly to expand wheelchair access.

There were a number of protests in which disabled residents in wheelchairs disrupted RTD service and were arrested.

The protests were particularly disturbing for all concerned — RTD, the drivers and the police.

The sight of an abled-bodied police officer toting away a wheelchair-bound citizen is not the stuff for law enforcement scrapbooks, nor is it the kind of publicity designed to attract bus riders generally.

In 1982, the RTD board, which then was an appointed body, voted against equipping 89 new buses with special lifts capable of handling wheelchair passengers. That vote set off the protests.

An elected board took over in 1983 and one of its first acts was to reverse that vote and authorize the purchase of the lifts at a cost of well over $1 million.

At the same time RTD struggled with the issue of whether to retrofit existing buses with lifts, and in 1985 resolved it with a resolution that it would buy lifts for all new buses, but not pursue a retrofitting program.

There had been a history of mechanical problems with some of the lifts, and on more than one occasion a lift would fail, dumping the wheelchair passenger in the process.

In 1982, then Gov. Dick Lamm refused to go along with a proposal by the American Disabled for Accessible Public Transportation, which was demanding wheelchair access to “all U.S. public buses."

Lamm suggested in a speech to the American Public Transit Association that such a policy might result in rides costing $600 each: “If America can't say no to a system that costs $600 per ride, we don't deserve to continue as a great nation.“

But as they say, that was then, this is now.

Just last fall, RTD was awarded a special citation for having "the finest accessible bus service in the nation." The award came from the President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities.

Indeed. it is beyond dispute that RTD has in some respects led the nation. Its experience in developing its current fleet of buses was the prime example used by congressional supporters of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

In addition, it is a fact that RTD was the first agency to order its over-the-road buses equipped with lifts.

Until RTD's first order, these larger vehicles had been built without lifts.

The RTD program hasn’t been accomplished without significant expense.

It has cost about $8 million for the lift equipment and millions more for parts, maintenance and training.

But the latest figures show per-ride costs are far below the $600 figure mentioned by Lamm.

The lifts cost about $13,000 a copy.

Because the life of a bus normally is calculated at 12 years, this works out to a little more than $1,000 a bus per year.

To this must be added the maintenance cost, which has been dropping each year. As recently as 1985 the cost of maintaining an individual lift was $1,798.

This year the average is just over $500.

Even without the retrofitting program rejected by the board in 1985, RTD has managed to increase greatly its percentage of lift-equipped buses. In 1985, only 54 percent of buses were so equipped. This year 81 percent are.

In recent years, disabled ridership has gone up sharply. In 1982 it was just over 9,000 wheelchair boardings, but last year it reached an estimated 45,000.

According to RTD figures, the per-ride cost may have reached $80 in 1984, but with the increase in ridership and the drop in maintenance cost, the cost per ride now has dropped to about $19 a ride, according to the latest calculations.

What is not known is how many of Denver’s disabled community actually are served by the lifts. In the mid-1980s, it was estimated that only a few hundred wheelchair-bound residents were regular bus riders.

Even as RTD has fitted new buses with the lifts, demands for its HandyRide service have continued to increase. This door-to-door service is available to both the elderly and the handicapped.

Some of its wheelchair passengers could be served by regular buses, but many others are unable to get to the bus stop and therefore require the HandyRide service.

Precise calculations aren’t available, but it is estimated the cost per ride for using the van service is about $50.

Lamm, contacted this week, said he basically hasn’t changed his position on the issue.

He said the $600 figure he used in 1982 was based on the experience of the St. Louis bus company.

“To govern is to choose," he said, "and I don't believe this nation should make every bus wheelchair-accessible. Should the handicapped be provided transportation? Of course, but it should be provided in the most cost-effective way possible.”

Lamm mentioned the expensive elevator system that is a part of the Washington, D.C., subway system as an example of a method that isn't cost-effective.

The Denver experience does indicate that the costs of accommodating the wheelchair-bound citizen may not be an endlessly upward spiral. But the key indicator that needs watching is the number of passengers using the service.

The taxpayers, the RTD board and staff members clearly have done their part.

The wheelchair service is now available on nearly every bus, yet ridership has flattened out.

The estimate of 45,000 wheelchair passengers for 1989 is just a few hundred higher than the 1986 level.

More persons must be encouraged to use the service. Now that maintenance costs are down, the only way to decrease the still-considerate per-ride cost is to increase the number of passengers using the lifts.

The most compelling case the disabled community can make for greater access is to demonstrate an even higher usage of the existing facilities.

Highlighted Text: Even without the retrofitting program rejected by the board in 1985, RTD has managed to increase greatly its percentage of
lift-equipped buses. In 1985, only 54 percent of buses were so equipped. This year 81 percent are.


Photo by The Denver Post/Duane Howell: A slight woman in a wheelchair is being escorted out by two uniformed and one plainclothes police. She is telling one of the officers something and they are all listening with slight smiles on their faces. Behind this group a man in a wheelchair is following, escorted by another police officer and behind them three other policemen stand guard.
Caption reads: PROTEST: An unidentified demonstrator at the Regional Transportation District office was escorted out during a 1982 protest over the purchase of new buses.

0 comments