10/39
ADAPT (244).JPG ADAPT (240)ThumbnailsADAPT (246)ADAPT (240)ThumbnailsADAPT (246)ADAPT (240)ThumbnailsADAPT (246)ADAPT (240)ThumbnailsADAPT (246)ADAPT (240)ThumbnailsADAPT (246)ADAPT (240)ThumbnailsADAPT (246)ADAPT (240)ThumbnailsADAPT (246)

The Cincinnati Enquirer Wednesday, May 21, 1, '86 p14—A

Title: The handicapped
Bus service that can meet special needs is the answer

The handicapped demonstrators who are demanding greater access to transportation systems could find that, even if they succeed, they may not like what they get.

About '75 members of American Disabled for Accessible Public Transit (ADAPT) have been in Cincinnati for the regional meeting of the American Public Transit Association (APTA). Their purpose has been to protest what they see as a violation of their civil rights. They want to be able to use all modes of public transportation as others do.

ADAPT is focusing on bus systems, asking that all buses — on a progressive basis -- be provided with lifts for the handicapped. That might be a valid answer, if the money were available, but the experience of states such as California and Michigan shows that the handicapped prefer a more personalized service, such as the Access shuttles that Metro provides.

Both California and Michigan have state laws requiring fully accessible systems, but the use of regular buses is negligible. Most of the handicapped prefer the “Dial-a-Ride” services that supplement the regular system.

That service seems the best way. With Cincinnati's hilly terrain for example, how would the handicapped reach the bus stops? How far would they have to go to reach a "regular" bus stop? How far must they travel when they get off? What happens in chilly, stormy or snowy weather?

From the bus service's standpoint, how do buses keep schedules? How many areas on a bus would have to be cleared for handicapped equipment? What would be the costs? How would those costs be met?

APTA officials say their policy is to recommend that local services do what is best, considering their terrain, climate, resources and needs -— always in consultation with the community served.

Metro’s Access has had its troubles meeting the needs of the handicapped. Last year, the demand was so great that the handicapped had to wait for as long as a week before they could schedule a ride. Although the problem has been helped somewhat, Metro’s officials frankly agree that it is not ideal.

Improvement is needed. The handicapped must have freedom of movement. The question is, what is best for them and what is possible?

The problem won't be easily solved. More bus service is needed in many areas of Greater Cincinnati, and with the cut in federal funds, money will be hard to come by.

But Cincinnati's coalition of the handicapped has found negotiation preferable to confrontation. Although the coalition is upset about the limitations of Access, it still sees co-operative decisions as the wisest course. And it is. Together with Metro, they must find a practical answer to their needs.

0 comments