[added text lays over the document reading This Victory by ADAPT]

[original document reads] Supreme Court of the United States

Olmstead, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Human Resources, et al [illegible]
by zimring, guardian [illegible] and next friends [illegible]

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District

No 98-[illegible] argued April 21, 1999--Decided June 22, 1999

In the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), Congress described the isolation and segregation of individuals with disabilities as a serious and pervasive form of discrimination. 42 U. S. C. 12101 (a) (2), (5). Title II of the ADA, which proscribes discrimination in the provision of public services, specifies, inter alia, that no qualified individual with a disability shall, "by reason of such disability," be excluded from participation in, or be denied the benefits of, a public entity's services, programs, or activities. 12132. Congress instructed the Attorney General to issue regulations implementing Title II's discrimination proscription. See 12134 (a). One such regulation, known as the "integration regulation," requires a "public entity [to administer...programs...in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified individuals with disabilities." 28 CFR 35.130 (d). A further prescription, here called the "reasonable-modifications regulation," requires public entities to "make reasonable modifications" to avoid "discrimination..on the basis of disability" but does not require

建立在

星期四 18 七月 2013

發佈在

星期一 9 九月 2019

相簿

• The Olmstead v. LC & EW Supreme Court Decision, June 22 1999

點閱次數

163

評級分數

沒有評級

評級這張相片

EXIF 資料

Make

Canon

Model

Canon EOS 40D

DateTimeOriginal

2013:07:18 10:53:34

ApertureFNumber

f/11.0