- ენაAfrikaans Argentina AzÉrbaycanca
á¥áá áá£áá Äesky Ãslenska
áá¶áá¶ááááá à¤à¥à¤à¤à¤£à¥ বাà¦à¦²à¦¾
தமிழ௠à²à²¨à³à²¨à²¡ ภาษาà¹à¸à¸¢
ä¸æ (ç¹é«) ä¸æ (é¦æ¸¯) Bahasa Indonesia
Brasil Brezhoneg CatalÃ
ç®ä½ä¸æ Dansk Deutsch
Dhivehi English English
English Español Esperanto
Estonian Finnish Français
Français Gaeilge Galego
Hrvatski Italiano Îλληνικά
íêµì´ LatvieÅ¡u Lëtzebuergesch
Lietuviu Magyar Malay
Nederlands Norwegian nynorsk Norwegian
Polski Português RomânÄ
Slovenšcina Slovensky Srpski
Svenska Türkçe Tiếng Viá»t
Ù¾Ø§Ø±Ø³Û æ¥æ¬èª ÐÑлгаÑÑки
ÐакедонÑки Ðонгол Ð ÑÑÑкий
СÑпÑки УкÑаÑнÑÑка ×¢×ר×ת
اÙعربÙØ© اÙعربÙØ©
დასაწყისი / გალერეა / სიტყვა boycott 3
ADAPT (145)
The Handicapped Coloradan, October 1984 [Headline] McDonald’s Statement Called “Unacceptable” The response by McDonald’s to demands by wheelchair protestors that the fast food chain improve the accessibility of its restaurants was described as unacceptable by a spokesperson for the Access Institute. Wade Blank said that Access was contacting McDonald’s again and if the company’s response did not improve his organization might well return to the picket lines. Starting in June, Access picketed McDonald’s restaurants in Denver, Colorado Springs, Cheyenne, Wyo., El Paso, Tex., Syracuse, N.Y., and Kansas City, Mo. Demonstrators were arrested in Colorado Springs and at one of the Denver demonstrations. At an Aug. 17 meeting, McDonald’s representatives warned Access that if the protests continued, the fast food chain was prepared to take demonstrators to court. At that meeting, McDonald’s suggested that it would be willing to remodel restaurants owned by the company, but that it did not have the power to order individually owned franchises to follow suit. Company representatives estimated that the retrofitting operation would affect some 2,200 of the more that 7,700 McDonald’s across the country and would cost between $3 and $5 million. At a second meeting a week later, McDonald’s seemed ready to make further concessions and promised to issue a policy statement in September. Blank said he had expected that statement to satisfy many of Access’s demands. Instead, McDonald’s response took the form of a memo from its vice president for national operations to regional managers and vice presidents, outlining the company’s record on accessibility and listing the standards the company suggested its licensees follow. Blank said the memo shows that McDonald’s is “not really serious about what they’re doing.” In fact, he said, Access did not receive a copy of the memo and had to ask McDonald’s for one. Throughout the discussions, McDonald’s has argued that it would not bow to pressure and that the company’s record on accessibility was a good one. The memo, dated Sept. 12, 1984 and written by Tom Glasgow, reaffirmed that position. Glasgow said that since 1979 McDonald’s has been following accessibility guidelines set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for its company-owned (McOpCo) restaurants as well as its licensed operations. “Currently with in excess of 2000 McDonald’s restaurants accessible to wheelchair users, we are the leaders in this area in the quick service restaurant industry and, indeed most probably, in any segment of the food service industry,” Glasgow wrote. Glasgow listed four minimum accessibility standards that were followed by McOpCo owned restaurants. “Parking Spaces-Special parking located as close to the building as possible (striping according to ANSI). In addition, vertical signage making these spaces even more obvious is being installed. “Ramps/Curb Buts—Convenient as possible to special parking (per ANSI specifications). “Table Access—Although table heights at McDonald’s restaurants meet or exceed ANSI standards we need tables which wheelchair users can easily use. Movable seating is preferred. “Rest Rooms- These will be made accessible as remodeling becomes necessary and affordable. Restaurants not currently planning to remodel should make modifications such as installing grab bars and widening stalls to make these facilities more functional for wheelchair users when possible.” However, Glasgow pointed out that since licenses own three out of every four stores system wide, area managers and vice presidents could only recommend that these standards be followed. Table access has been one of the Access Institute’s major goals in their dealings with McDonald’s. Currently, most if not all McDonald’s restaurants use seating that is physically attached to tables, making it impossible for a person in a wheelchair to use a table without blocking the aisle. The Access Institute had also asked that McDonald’s use people with disabilities in at least 10 percent of its ads. That issue was not addressed in the memo. The memo made no mention of the Access Institute or the pickets. Glasgow concluded by saying, “Accessibility has been something we as a corporation have been committed to for years. Our efforts are not new. Our commitment is not new. We expect this commitment will be continually reinforced through action.” However, so far that commitment seems not to have impressed wheelchair users. The executive board of the Colorado Coalition for Persons with Disabilities recently passed a resolution calling upon members of the 50 or so organizations it represents to boycott McDonald’s until the company makes a stronger commitment to accessibility. McDonald’s size and reputation were why the company was singled out by the Access Institute, according to Blank. He said if McDonald’s agreed to their requests then other national chains would follow suit.
ADAPT (463)
San Antonio, read their lips: “No lifts, no $1.6 million convention. [This story is continued on 478 but it is included here in its entirety for ease of reading.] The President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities will not hold its annual convention in San Antonio in 1991 because that city has no mainline accessible transit and no plans to introduce any. Instead, the meeting will be held in Dallas, which has 100 lift-equipped buses and plans to introduce more. It is estimated that the meeting, which will attract 4,000 to 5,000 people, would have brought at least $1.6 million to San Antonio. Committee chairman Harold Russell said he was informed of San Antonio's position on accessible public transit in January by Wayne Cook, general manager of VIA, San Antonio's transit system. Russell said the committee's decision was in keeping with President Bush's promise to bring the 37 million Americans with disabilities into the economic work force. "Disabled Americans must become full partners in America's opportunity society,” the President told Congress. In order to make the President's vision a reality, Russell said mainline accessible public transit has to be an option for people with disabilities who want to join the work force. “We have found that, next to attitudes, lack of accessible transportation is the most important significant barrier to employment of people with disabilities," Russell said. "There are 8.2 million people with disabilities of working age in this country who are unemployed but who can work and want to work. That's a terrible waste of talent, and it's not fair to the people who are prevented from working." Russell said his committee's mission to help people with disabilities find employment would be compromised if they held their annual meeting in San Antonio. "The issue is not transportation for people who attend our meeting," he said. “It’s everyday access to mainline transit for people with any kind of disability who "want to work and can work.” The committee's credibility was at stake, he added. Russell expressed his regret about the move. “San Antonio is a beautiful city, with wonderful people. The mayor and members of the city administration are working very hard to make the city accessible to everyone. Maybe we can come to San Antonio at a later date, when VIA's policy has changed.” Kent Waldrep, chairman of the Texas Governor's Committee for Disabled Persons, supported the decision to move the convention to Dallas. “This is one way that those of us who work in the disability field can support the goal of employment. We're not saying that every transit system needs to make all of their vehicles accessible right away,” he said. “We do think that transit operators should make an honest effort to begin that process, though. A system like San Antonio's that requires advance notice to travel just won't work for active people with disabilities who work-and shop and do all the things other people do. It’s not fair to riders or to their employers, who can't ask them ‘to travel around the city on short notice in the course of their work.” Waldrep also pointed out that in the long run accessible mainline ‘service would be far more economical than relying solely on the current paratransit system. “It doesn't make sense to make people who would rather ride mainline buses use a system that costs the taxpayers $13.50 for every ride. Why not save the heavily subsidized rides for those people who really need them?" Waldrep suggested that if everybody who is eligible to use the paratransit system in San Antonio did so, VIA wouldn't be able to pay the bill. “In the long run, putting lifts on buses will save money,” he said, "as well as being the right thing to do.” In response to the decision by the President's committee, the Coalition of Texans with Disabilities (CTD) announced" that CTD has is cancelling plans to hold its annual meeting in San Antonio. CTD president Larry Correu said that his group has met with VIA over the years to discuss the system ’s reluctance to provide accessible mainline service. He pointed out that VIA has been under a court order since 1985 to supply such service. “Maybe if CTD and a lot of other state and national organizations refuse to hold their meetings in San Antonio, they'll understand how serious the issue is,” he said. Correu said he has learned that several other organizations were also planning on boycotting San Antonio.
ADAPT (478)
San Antonio says no to lifts, loses major disability meet This article is a continuation of the one on 463, and the entire text is included there, for ease of reading.