- Kierunek sortowaniaDomyślnie
Tytuł zdjęcia, A → Z
Tytuł zdjęcia, Z → A
Data utworzenia, wcześniejsze → starsze
Data utworzenia, starsze → wcześniejsze
Data publikacji, wcześniejsze → starsze
Data publikacji, starsze → wcześniejsze
Ocena, wysoka → niska
Ocena, niska → wysoka
✔ Liczba odwiedzin, wysoka → niska
Liczba odwiedzin, niska → wysoka - JęzykAfrikaans Argentina AzÉrbaycanca
á¥áá áá£áá Äesky Ãslenska
áá¶áá¶ááááá à¤à¥à¤à¤à¤£à¥ বাà¦à¦²à¦¾
தமிழ௠à²à²¨à³à²¨à²¡ ภาษาà¹à¸à¸¢
ä¸æ (ç¹é«) ä¸æ (é¦æ¸¯) Bahasa Indonesia
Brasil Brezhoneg CatalÃ
ç®ä½ä¸æ Dansk Deutsch
Dhivehi English English
English Español Esperanto
Estonian Finnish Français
Français Gaeilge Galego
Hrvatski Italiano Îλληνικά
íêµì´ LatvieÅ¡u Lëtzebuergesch
Lietuviu Magyar Malay
Nederlands Norwegian nynorsk Norwegian
Polski Português RomânÄ
Slovenšcina Slovensky Srpski
Svenska Türkçe Tiếng Viá»t
Ù¾Ø§Ø±Ø³Û æ¥æ¬èª ÐÑлгаÑÑки
ÐакедонÑки Ðонгол Ð ÑÑÑкий
СÑпÑки УкÑаÑнÑÑка ×¢×ר×ת
اÙعربÙØ© اÙعربÙØ©
Strona główna / Albumy 94
Data umieszczenia / 2020 / listopad / 22
ADAPT (1366)
Incitement Incitement Incitement Volume 18 No. 1 A Publication of ADAPT Spring 2002 [Headline] Segregation and the Medical Model Thrive in the Independent Living Movement's Cradle Unnecessary institutionalization is alive and well--thriving, in fact-- in the heart of San Francisco! Ironically, while the rest of the country is attempting to implement the Supreme Court's Olmstead decision, California/ San Francisco--the very cradle of the independent living movement--is rebuilding a 1200 bed nursing facility that many in the disability rights community believe violates the spirit, if not the letter, of the Supreme Court decision. Laguna Honda rises up from a steep, steep hillside off a highway, a collection of 13 wings each five stories high. The rebuilding of this nursing home was the reason over 500 activists from across the nation gathered in San Francisco in October. Outrage over this contemptuous act was so high folks came despite it being just about a month after September 11th. [Subheading] Tear Down the Walls Sunday, activists traveled by subway for a rally in a small park across the street from the massive nursing home. 500 folks came despite chilly, rainy weather to share their dismay that such a travesty is to take place. People wanted San Franciscans and the world to know the disability community's view of this. Speakers [image] [image caption] After the rally, protesters left stars of David, crescents and crosses at the foot of the statue of Florence Nightingale, in remembrance of those who have been sacrificed for this facilities existence, and other institutions and nursing homes across America. Photo by Terry Schmitt [text continues] [boxed text] ADAPT/Incitement 1339 Lamar SQ DR #101 Austin TX 78704 (512) 442-0252 v/TTY (512) 442-0522 FAX Incitement is produced from the offices of Topeka Independent Living Resource Center (TILRC). Articles, letters, compositions, displays and photos are encouraged. Please contact Tessa Goupil for deadlines for submission of materials. The Editor reserves the right to edit or omit any material that is submitted. For more information, contact Tessa Goupil at TILRC or Stephanie Thomas at ADAPT. Topeka Independent Living Resource Center, Inc. 501 SW Jackson St., Suite 100 Topeka, KS 66603-3300 (785) 2334572 v/TTY (785) 233-1815 TTY (785) 233-1561 FAX [text resumes] ers included representatives of many disability organizations from across the state and the nation, and in addition a few brave souls who were waiting to leave Laguna Honda. "I've been trying to get out for six years" said Jessie "that's way too long to wait for your freedom!" At the end of the rally, the participants lined up and marched across the street, through the heavy metal gates of the nursing home grounds and up the alp-like slopes of the drive that circles the Laguna Honda facility. We were more than four city blocks long. The administration had not wanted anyone on their grounds, but we felt that those who had traveled so far, and those who cared enough to speak out, should get an up-close look at the nursing home, which is larger than many small towns! The march was not easy, in part because of the steep terrain, in part because of the heaviness of the issue at hand. All along the route, the institutional police force (their real title) stared after us, and the assistant administrator Mr. Christmas hovered around the front, apparently trying to pretend this was some kind of tour. As marchers looked up at the windows above they saw faces of those who must live inside the 30 bed wards looking down, some waiving, some looking amazed at the numbers who had come in their support. Staff too looked down, but most looked threatened and surprised anyone would have a problem with such a set up. As we rounded the far side of the facility, few eyes were dry. Ahead was a bus coming to pick up and drop off staff On it's side was an ad: a young boy looking out, angry and afraid; below was the caption "abuse [image] [image caption] The group marched around the whole huge building before gathering in front for the end of the tally. The institutional police had large buses at the ready to take protesters to some other institutional facility. Photo by Terry Schmitt Spring 2002 [text resumes] "Governor Gray's refusal to negotiate speaks volumes about his attitudes about the rights of people with disabilities," said Daniese McMullin Powell, Delaware ADAPT Organizer "We were willing to compromise. The fact that he wouldn't even authorize the Director of Human Services, or the State Medicaid Director to act on his behalf is further evidence of his unwillingness to even consider measures to keep California from forcing its citizens into institutional settings." ADAPT demanded that Gov. Davis stop providing funds for the state match portion of Medi-Cal (California's version of Medicaid) for people now in Laguna Honda, or at risk for admission. In addition, ADAPT wanted the Governor to assure creation of a system where Medi-Cal funds follow and support the person rather than being attached to a specific institutional. setting. By choosing to put between $400-$600 million into rebuilding Laguna Honda, the city and state are locking up millions of additional dollars in Medicaid funds that could be used more cost effectively to support people in the community. Tying these funds to Laguna Honda also forces older and disabled people to live there rather than staying in their own homes and receiving their long term care services there. "We were willing to put ourselves in harm's way because we are the lucky ones-we've all managed to escape places like Laguna Honda," said Nadina Laspina, ADAPT Organizer from New York City. "I live and work in the shadow of the World Trade Center, and I came here to San Francisco because as a New Yorker, I witnessed an unspeakable horror that left me feeling violated and powerless. As a person with a disability, I want to put an end to another horror that makes me feel violated the honor of Laguna Honda and of all nursing homes. For those of us who have managed to survive and escape them, the threat of a nursing home is truly as frightening as the threat of terrorism. There is a better way." [image] [image caption] In the end however, the Governor refused to back down and 115 people were arrested. [Subheading] Brown Stays Solidly Behind Segregation Wednesday was the day of the meeting with Mayor Willie Brown. However, within moments it was clear that the Mayor had no intention of even listening to the concerns of people with disabilities. As Organizer Linda Anthony put it "He came in planning not to listen to anything". He did not care that the Supreme Court had ruled unnecessary institutionalization was discrimination. He did not want to know about disabled people's civil rights. He even refused to consider that the wording of the bond issue does not require rebuilding the institution, only the funding for services for those inside. Mayor Brown refused to even talk about community alternatives to rebuilding city owned Laguna Honda Hospital. He just wanted to talk about accessibility for people with disabilities and high salaries for his institutional workers. He did not even care his city paid half the institutional salary to community care workers and good access is irrelevant if you are stuck in a nursing home. San Francisco, the cradle of the independent living movement, had [image] [image caption] Blocking McAllister. Photo courtesy of Memphis CIL. [text resumes] made a deal with the devil: high level accessibility in certain areas and high paying jobs for a few people in exchange for the lives of thousands of San Franciscan who were unlucky enough to become disabled and poor. "Mayor Brown's arrogant manner and disregard for us said loud and clear that he had no intention of seriously dis-cussing the issues, or considering people's civil rights" said Steve Verriden ADAPT Organizer from Wisconsin. "As a person with a disability himself, we had hoped he would be more knowledgeable about community alternatives to warehousing people with disabilities and seniors, but he made it clear that his only worry is for his own future political contributions, not for the futures of the over loon people locked up in Laguna Honda." Calling a press conference after-ward, those at the meeting declared, "segregation and discrimination are alive and well, thriving in fact, here in San Francisco." [Subheading] And ADAPT Goes to the Feds But ADAPT had one more call to make, over the heads of city and state officials, forcing a meeting with the highest ranking regional representative of the Department of Health and Hinman services to discuss discontinuing Medicaid reimbursement for the facility's illegal 30 bed wards. Taking the issue to the third player, 500 ADAPT activists marched over and blockaded the United Nations Plaza Federal Building until a meeting was arranged with Josh Valdez, the HITS Secretary's Regional Representative for Region IX, and Steven Derring, the Region IX Deputy Director for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Valdez and Derring not only agreed to meet and discuss ADAPT's Civil Rights complaints against Laguna Honda, but to set another meeting and continue the dialog. Earlier this fall ADAPT filed the complaints with the FIHS Office of Civil Rights based on the spending of state and federal Medicaid funds on forced institutionalization of persons with disabilities in an outrageously out of compliance structure, violating both the ADA and the U.S. Supreme Court Olmstead decision. The meeting with Valdez and Derring ended a week of ADAPT protests aimed at calling public attention to the rebuilding of Laguna. Honda so funds can be redirected to community services for older and disabled San Franciscans. While traffic around the Civic Center may get back to normal with ADAPT's departure, ADAPT committed to support the California disability community by continuing the fight for community services at the federal level. Federal strategies include pursuing the Civil Rights complaints and demanding that administration officials enforce President Bush's Executive Order. The order mandates that people locked away in places like Laguna Honda must be given a choice in where they receive their long term care services by immediately implementing the "Olmstead" decision, which prohibits discrimination by unnecessary institutionalization. [image] [image caption] Surrounding the Federal Building. Photo courtesy of Memphis CIL. [Subheading] Aftermath As if ashamed to carry through with at least this aspect of their treatment of people with disabilities, all charges were dropped against the 115 arrested on Tuesday. Governor Gray Davis, under his "Aging with Dignity" initiative, announced on December 12th that the California Department of Health Services had secured $27.5 million in additional funding for county, city and special districts that operate nursing homes. This federal funding is in addition to Medi-Cal reimbursements currently received by these government entities and will be provided on an annual basis. The Governor found no new funds to implement Olmstead. With friends like those, who needs enemies? Meanwhile the disability community has not been idle. On December 18, 2001, the San Francisco based District Court Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong ruled that a civil rights lawsuit, filed by 10 Laguna Honda residents can move forward. Al-though Armstrong ruled some of the claims made by the original plaintiffs must be removed from the suit, she agreed that the case against the city, county and state will move forward, despite the defendants' multiple pleas to dismiss the case. The residents, represented by DREDF among others, are claiming violations of the ADA, the Nursing Home Reform Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by not providing community-based services for those who want to live in their own homes instead of nursing homes and other institutions. The lawsuit cites the 1999 U.S. Supreme Court Olmstead decision, which ruled that "unnecessarily" institutionalizing people with disabilities is a form of discrimination. And in February another suit was filed by Protection and Advocacy, to get residents of developmental centers, institutions for people with developmental dis-abilities, better options for community services and help in getting out and saying out of these institutions. State officials concede it costs more than twice as much to keep someone in the state hospitals as it does in the community, yet the Governor and legislature have done little to nothing to really address the problem. The Coalition of Californians for Olmstead held an action January 16th, 2002 at Governor Davis' offices in Sacramento, San Diego and San Francisco. Over 60 people participated in person, more via mail and telephone, to tell the Governor to follow the Olmstead decision and make community living options a reality and not rhetoric. They also shared their thoughts and feelings about the lack of community resources that result in "default" nursing home and other institutional placements: "People with disabilities want to live in apartments and homes. It's not right to warehouse them in nursing homes." "I'm someone who uses attendants. There is something wrong though when you think about the fact that my attendants are paid little more than minimum wage. Without them I would be in nursing home." "I used to live in a nursing home, and I know that there are a lot of people who would like to be here today, but they are too scared and they don't know how to get out." Those individuals fear of retaliation seems very real after our ADAPT action in San Francisco. ADAPT went to raise a loud cry against the outrageous acts of this allegedly progressive city and state, but it will take ongoing and hard hitting efforts to get the attention of the jack asses in charge here! In the meantime, if you do go to visit, don't get sick and don't stay very long; things have changed in the one- time Mecca for people with disabilities.
ADAPT (1369)
ADAPT (1363)
This page continues the article from Image 1366. Full text available on 1366 for easier reading.
ADAPT (1411)
Incitement Incitement Incitement Volume 18 No. 3 A Publication of ADAPT Fall 2002 [Headline] Ten Worst States Survey 2002/2003 [Subheading] Louisiana The Worst in the Nation Periodically ADAPT ranks how the states are doing in providing options for people with disabilities and older Americans to live and receive sup-port services in the community. Looking at the states provision of long term services and supports, our analysis for this ranking weighed various long term care factors based both on published data and on the evaluation of people with disabilities (old and young). ADAPT used three sources of information to rank the states: * The MEDSTAT Group Inc data on Medicaid long term care expenditure in Federal Fiscal Year 2001; (May,2002) * The State of the States in Develop-mental Disabilities: 2002 Study Summary; (June 2002) * Advocate's assessment of the states services.(September 2002) The rankings at right are ADAPT's analysis of the above information: [boxed text] TEN WORST RANKING • 1. Louisiana (worst nationally) • 2. Mississippi • 3. Washington, DC • 4. Illinois • 5. Indiana • 6. Tennessee • 7. Nevada • 8. New Jersey • 9. Ohio • 10. Georgia The next ten worst states: Alabama, Florida, Pennsylvania, Texas, Kentucky, Delaware, Virginia, Maryland, Arkansas and Missouri.
ADAPT (1339)
ADAPT (1408)
This page continues the article from Image 1409. Full text is available on 1409 for easier reading.
ADAPT (1416)
ADAPT (1364)
This page continues the article from Image 1366. Full text is available on 1366 for easier reading.
ADAPT (1340)
Austin American Statesman Wednesday 5/16/01 Nation Digest [image] [image caption] Damon Higgins/Cox Washington Bureau [Headline] A request for the president Rona Schnall of Austin joined hundreds of other people outside the White House to urge President Bush to take steps to promote independence among people with disabilities.
ADAPT (1412)
This page continues the article from Image 1414. Full text is available on 1414 for easier reading.
ADAPT (1410)
[Headline] Louisiana FY 2001 [Subheading] The Worst in the Country [Subheading] Background Information. Louisiana spends 90.3% of Medicaid Long Term Care (LTC) dollars on nursing homes and ICF-MR facilities; This funding bias exists: • 30 years after the passage of Section 504 • 12 years after the passage of the ADA • 2 years after the Supreme Court's Olmstead decision [Subheading] The Numbers: • Nursing Homes: 69% on facilities for people with disabilities, old and young • ICF-MR: 21.3% on facilities for people with developmental disabilities • Community spending: 9.7% (Medicaid waivers, Home Health) Total Louisiana Medicaid LTC spending: $1.68 billion Louisiana Medicaid spending on nursing homes: $1.16 billion Louisiana Medicaid spending on ICF-MR: $ 355.27 million Louisiana Medicaid total spending on Community: $ 163.43 million State's ratio of nursing home beds per capita exceeds national average by more than 50%. This means Louisiana has more beds than it needs (20 % are empty). States ratio of ICF-MR beds is three times the national average. Louisiana Medicaid per capita spending nursing homes: $259.43 (over 70% higher than national average) National Medicaid per capita spending nursing homes: $150.04 Louisiana Medicaid per capita spending on ICF-MR: 79.57 (over 115% higher than national average) National Medicaid per capita spending on ICF-MR: $36.35 Louisiana Medicaid per capita spending on Community: $36.60 (Less than 1/2 the national average) National Medicaid per capita spending on Community: $77.99 Access to Long Term Care is uncoordinated across programs. Louisiana's system is fragmented and difficult for people to access. Attendant wages average $5.56 - only 7% have health benefits.
ADAPT (1409)
[Headline] ADAPT'S Ten Worst States [Subheading] Summary Background Louisiana: outline of the state Mississippi: outline of the state Washington DC: outline of the state Illinois: outline of the state Indiana: outline of the state Tennessee: outline of the state Nevada: outline of the state 90.3% of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions. Spends less than 1/2 the national average per capita on community services. 5th highest spending per capita on nursing home services. 3rd highest spending per capita for ICF-MR facilities for people with developmental disabilities. 90.7% of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions. 47th in community fiscal effort for persons with developmental disabilities. 23rd in per capita spending on nursing homes. 94 % of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions 5th lowest spending per capita on community services. 4th highest spending per capita on nursing homes. The highest per capita spending on ICF-MR facilities. 85.6% of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions. 6th lowest spending per capita on community spending. 42nd in community fiscal effort for persons with developmental disabilities. 85.3 % of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions. 7th lowest spending per capita on community services. 34th in community fiscal effort for person with developmental disabilities. 84.6% of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions. 8th lowest spending per capita on community services. 39th in community fiscal effort for persons with developmental disabilities. 74.7% of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions. 2nd lowest spending per capita on community services. Lowest in the nation community fiscal effort for persons with developmental disabilities. New Jersey: outline of the state Ohio: outline of the state Georgia: outline of the state 81.9% of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions 6th highest spending per capita on nursing homes. 41st in community fiscal effort for persons with developmental disabilities. 85.1 % of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions. 6th highest spending per capita on ICF-MR facilities. 12th highest spending per capita on nursing homes. 79.4% of long term care spending goes for nursing homes and other institutions 4th lowest spending per capita on community services. 50th in community effort for persons with developmental disabilities. [boxed text] Dear Advocates for Home and Community Services: These are the "Ten Worst States." Use this information to reform the long term service and support system. Hold a press conference to highlight the poor job these states are doing, and issue a challenge to state officials to improve the community service system. COMMUNITY FIRST! Though being in the worst category is nothing to be proud of, it gives your state the opportunity to commit to using 2002/2003 as a year to improve community services. If you have any question please contact us at 512/442-0252. For an Institution Free America, The ADAPT Collective
ADAPT (1401)
This page continues the article from Image 1405. Full text is available on 1405 for easier reading.
ADAPT (1415)
ADAPT (1360)
Foreign language newspaper coverage of the ADAPT action.